|Evaluating the readability of text has been a critical step in several applications, ranging from text simplification, learning new languages, providing school children with appropriate reading material to conveying important medical information in an easily understandable way. A lot of research has been dedicated to evaluating readability on larger bodies of texts, like articles and paragraphs, but the application on single sentences has received less attention. In this paper, we explore several machine learning techniques - logistic regression, random forest, Naive Bayes, KNN, MLP, XGBoost - on a corpus of sentences from the English and simple English Wikipedia. We build and compare a series of binary readability classifiers using extracted features as well as generated all-MiniLM-L6-v2-based embeddings, and evaluate them against standard classification evaluation metrics. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time this sentence transformer is used in the task of readability assessment. Overall, we found that the MLP models, with and without embeddings, as well as the Random Forest, outperformed the other machine learning algorithms.
*** Title, author list and abstract as seen in the Camera-Ready version of the paper that was provided to Conference Committee. Small changes that may have occurred during processing by Springer may not appear in this window.